Skip to primary content

Nathan J. Bennett

Exploring diverse relationships between humans and the environment with a critical and solution-oriented lens.

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Experience
  • Research
  • Publications
  • Outreach
  • Consulting
  • Contact

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Conservation Social Science: Understanding and Integrating Human Dimensions to Improve Conservation

Posted on December 14, 2016 by Nathan J. Bennett

A group of colleagues and I recently published an Open Access review paper in Biological Conservation titled “Conservation Social Science: Understanding and Integrating Human Dimensions to Improve Conservation“. It can be found here and more information follows below.

fig-3-overview-of-conservation-social-sciences

Highlights

  • A better understanding of the human dimensions of environmental issues can improve conservation.
  • Yet there is a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences.
  • We review 18 fields and identify 10 distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to conservation.
  • This review paper provides a succinct reference for those wishing to engage with the conservation social sciences.
  • Greater engagement with the social sciences will facilitate more legitimate, salient, robust and effective conservation.

Abstract

It has long been claimed that a better understanding of human or social dimensions of environmental issues will improve conservation. The social sciences are one important means through which researchers and practitioners can attain that better understanding. Yet, a lack of awareness of the scope and uncertainty about the purpose of the conservation social sciences impedes the conservation community’s effective engagement with the human dimensions. This paper examines the scope and purpose of eighteen subfields of classic, interdisciplinary and applied conservation social sciences and articulates ten distinct contributions that the social sciences can make to understanding and improving conservation. In brief, the conservation social sciences can be valuable to conservation for descriptive, diagnostic, disruptive, reflexive, generative, innovative, or instrumental reasons. This review and supporting materials provides a succinct yet comprehensive reference for conservation scientists and practitioners. We contend that the social sciences can help facilitate conservation policies, actions and outcomes that are more legitimate, salient, robust and effective.

Reference

  1. Nathan J. Bennett, Robin Roth, Sarah C. Klain, Kai Chan, Patrick Christie, Douglas A. Clark, Georgina Cullman, Deborah Curran, Trevor J. Durbin, Graham Epstein, Alison Greenberg, Michael P Nelson, John Sandlos, Richard Stedman, Tara L Teel, Rebecca Thomas, Diogo Veríssimo, Carina Wyborn. Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.006

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • More
  • Email
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • Tumblr
  • Pinterest
  • Pocket
  • Telegram

Like this:

Like Loading...
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged Biological Conservation, conservation, Conservation Biology, Conservation Social Science, Conservation Social Sciences, environmental management, environmental social science, Nathan Bennett, natural resource management, social science by Nathan J. Bennett. Bookmark the permalink.
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Nathan J. Bennett
    • Join 102 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Nathan J. Bennett
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: